Message from our Executive Director / Wednesday's Meeting
That was quite a meeting this afternoon, that took many of us through a rollercoaster of emotions. Some emerged hopeful in learning that Minister Coleman had reversed his decision on the funding for multi-year clients of the Gaming funds.
It felt like a small battle in the war had been won and the sigh of relief through the room was palpable. Remember folks that this is only a partial victory that probably had to do with a variety of factors:
- Letters written by gaming clients;
- ·Spencer Herbert, Jenny Kwan, and probably members of the Liberal caucus as well (not publicly), who spoke in defense of the funding
- Constituents in the ridings of the Premier, Minister Coleman and Minister Krueger;
- The damage to credibility in not honouring multi-year agreements and the possibility of legal grounds to challenge the decision;
This is only speculation but my best guess. It does demonstrate that allies in community and among elected officials can make a difference. We are all happy to hear that the funding for multi-year clients will be forthcoming – but what about the others?
We cannot let this drive a wedge between us; this is a long-term effort and there are still many disturbing circumstances for us to deal with. We have to think about the future.
Back to our meeting.
The energy was great and it felt good to see so many of us in the arts community gather, ready to work together. As I said – this is the Alliance – not me and the three staff or the Board – but all of us together.
This is what I see were some of the items of consensus and outcomes of today’s meeting:
- We need a short term and a long-term strategy
- We need to speak the appropriate language to enlist allies in politics, in business, among our audiences, and with the social profit and the creative industries.
- We envision a society where “Art Matters”;
- There is interest in hiring a professional lobbyist to work with us and to help us learn how to work with government more effectively;
- We developed and agreed on developing an Advocacy Committee made up of the chairs of different sub-committees, including Direct Action, Research, Social Media, and Business and the Arts, and Alternative Funding.
Paul Gravet reminded me of the useful framework offered by John Holden (http://www. calgaryartsdevelopment.com/ john_holden). When we move into research and advocacy this framework may be useful. Holden suggests that we talk about the Intrinsic, Instrumental and Institutional value of the arts.
A Call To Action
Near the end of our session there was a call to action – specifically a rally next week on Wednesday at noon in Robson Square.
We didn’t have much opportunity to discuss this and I feel a little uncomfortable with not having the opportunity to fully discuss what it may look like and what its purpose is. I believe people want to bring attention to the arts – to see us as valued and valuable. I’m not sure that an event where we disrupt traffic or rant at the public would be useful at this point.
I ask the Direct Action Committee, which I assume will shape the event, to ask itself what the purpose is – what, specifically is being protested? Or is it a protest at all – can it be a means by which we engage the public in a positive manner – to demonstrate the value of the arts and that Art Matters?
What if it is an “Art-in” with public performance, characters, costumes, music – that makes Robson Square animated, exciting – where we demonstrate the value of arts and culture.
Maybe we celebrate our small victory and press for complete restoration of the gaming funds? That may be more useful in both the short-term and long-term.
We will report back the notes from today’s meeting and continue to engage in this advocacy work. Keep checking our website for updates and resources.
If you are not currently a member of the Alliance, please join us and if you are, please make sure that you renew.
Thanks again to all who participated in today’s meeting and those who signed up to serve on committees.
We will follow up with those who signed up and connet you virtually – each committee should select a chair and set up a work plan for the next few weeks. Chairs of those committees will form an Advocacy Committee, which will also include some members at large.
Respectfully,
Amir


Comments
Dandelions
The 'Dandelions' gesture was beautiful and imaginative - if you think about it. There are lots of different ways to do things and the group of speakers represented a good diversity of ideas and approaches.
Ian, you have excellent comments and food for thought in your first paragraph. Don't undercut yourself by demeaning a fellow artist who took a risk. When I was asked to disperse like an old dandelion, I was reminded of how creative our community can be in our future protests. And a bunch of us did go off and network and share ideas. We did it in a different setting, that's all.
This is not a time to be divisive. The best example we can set is to celebrate each other, forgive any miss-steps. The biggest asset we have is our common belief in human compassion and complexity.
Arts Benefits Society
In response to the governments` expressed attitude that the choice is whether to feed hungry children or support the arts, it may be useful to remind everyone concerned that it is the arts that is that is the first ones turned to when a benefit is planned. Think about all the money raised through telethons etc. We all know this story well, but I think that it could not hurt to remind society about the ways that we as artists care and share. Some letters of thanks from various organizations like the Variety Club and the CBC Christmas fundraisers for the Food Bank, etc. The dollars raised over the years through art auctions and other fundraisers would be astounding. Sure, it is not only artists that have made this possible but a team effort of members of BC society working together to make ours a better community. This is a message that we must get out.
On a lighter note, Dandelions? Perhaps the next time we gather for a rally it might be more productive to stay around to network and share ideas together, utilize the vibrant energy that we have when we come together and get charged up by our spokespersons, rather than dispersing like old dandelions...
Have a look
Please have a look at this website: www.wsartsalliance.com
Washington State Arts Alliance
From the home page, follow the links under "Advocacy". You might be amazed.
Tom
Protests, rallies, etc.
I want to add a couple of comments to this blog, since it seems to be the one with most action. I am very much in agreement with David MacIntyre, and I have expressed similar sentiments elsewhere (under "Media Release re: Wednesday's Meeting" and "Gaming Grant Update". I think that negative, disruptive, and whiny protests would get us nowhere. I would rather see us present a strong and positive face to the public. People need to learn what it is we do for them and why they should support us, not a bunch of disgruntled grabbers bitching because the public trough is empty. I, too, ask that the Alliance accept leadership here and now by organising events and public messages.
I also find "Culture Matters" to be a pathetically weak slogan. Let's drop it. I have offered to organise, with the help of Kevin, a think tank to come up with a bright and positive new slogan. I see this as the beginning of a movement that will not only protest cuts but also work and, yes, lobby, for increased funding and, hence, public awareness for arts and culture in the future. I applaud Amir's move to investigate and engage a professional lobbyist. This is a political reality, a necessity, and an important way to get things done.
Tom
Media spokespeople as a strategy
Who could we trust to speak on our behalf? and become a spokesperson for our cause? To reinstate the very real facts the media is not portraying, and to describe the reality of what this means for not only the arts sector, but for the well being of the entire province. We will all suffer great impoverishment if we are too slow to act up now.
'Without art, the crudeness of reality would make the world unbearable'. ~George Bernard Shaw
We need to book CBC radio, prime time TV, all news stations, papers, etc. And get a clear, concise message across. Let's find a committee to specifically deal with the media and get them up to date on the facts and the arguments that will win the public over. In working with the public and the media simultaneously we will have our best chance, and we must be intelligent about it. If there is any sector that can out smart this government - it's our sector.
We could work it like infomercials - I vote for Amir this week to get it rolling, and then someone famous for next week, and another famous artist the week after that, youth / students the next, and just keep it going right up to the olympics and beyond, until we tire them out. Bringing about clear, reasonable messages, that makes this government look like the fools they really are.
If anyone knows famous artists, media strategists, call them, we need them now.
I'm glad I have your
I'm glad I have your attention. This is serious business. I don't believe we should be improvising as we go.
My questions about Wednesday's rally were of an incredulous tone and you've misinterpreted them. We should NOT be disrupting traffic or causing any kind of inconvenience that would be detrimental to our cause. My point is that there must be substance and content to our rally next Wednesday, not just a bunch of colour, noise and street theatre. Such antics would look terrible and portray our community in exactly the wrong light - especially on television and in the press.
Whatever the protest, it must be smart and engaging, not a free-for-all without focus.
Where are the major players in the British Columbia arts community and what are they saying about the idea of a rally on Wednesday? We need the Symphony, the Opera, the big Theatre companies, the Art Gallery and some of Vancouver's artistic luminaries front and centre in this issue. Is the Alliance contacting these people and enlisting their support?
People are looking for clear, intelligent leadership on this issue. We cannot afford to make mistakes - the stakes are too high.
David
I suggest that a reality
I suggest that a reality check is in order. The media is displaying headlines that the cuts have been reversed. It is important to quickly state the real situation. What dollar$ were expected this year by all groups in the province, and what is actually going to be received this year. How many groups are affected. What percentage of cuts have been made over the last 5 years. etc.
The way the headlines appear, the fire has been put out.
State the facts.
Thanks for some of the very
Thanks for some of the very useful suggestions and criticism David. I agree that the economic argument is key in dealing with this government. There is no need, however, to make your criticism personal, as you chose to near the end of your blog. It is this sort of division in the community that our detractors are counting on.
I do understand my role and that of the Alliance - but we need the community to step-up as well; we need many leaders for a diverse constituency.
I wonder about the wisdom in protesting in a disruptive manner at a time when the government has spun the message to indicate that funds are being restored. Disrupting traffic will not be a positive light to shine on a sector that is already viewed as a radical group of whiners (how will that help with public perception, which is key to influencing government?)- our response must be rational, calm and strategic - that is what a lobbyist does. My reference to a professional lobbyist during the meeting was about increasing the Alliance's capacity to be effective in its government relations - about having an insider giving us access. That seemed clear to most people in the room. It is common practice in many other sectors for Advocacy and Service organizations to go this way. As far as I know the Arts sector has not done this before and that is where my question about what a "lobbyist" does came from.
I will continue to actively represent our sector to government as I have been and working with allies like Spencer. I hope you can direct your considerable energy and intelligence to helping us move forward together. I am happy to discuss strategy with you. Maybe you are able to organize an effective direct action for Wednesday?
Respectfully
Amir
Great Art
the "Best Place on Earth" deserves Great ART
"I do not want ART for a few
"I do not want ART for a few any more than education for a few, or freedom for a few."
William Morris
"Art washes from the soul the dust of everyday life."
Pablo Picasso
The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA)
NEA mission is "to enrich our Nation and its diverse cultural heritage by supporting works of artistic excellence, advancing learning in the arts, and strengthening the arts in communities throughout the country." Its slogan is "A great country deserves great art."
Response to the meeting
I too am frustrated that there was no direct action plan that came out of the meeting yesterday. I attended the meeting thinking that we were organizing a public demonstration against the BC Government's treatment of it's artists. We must DO something with the significant energy that the hundreds of outraged artists are experiencing and we must do it soon - before that energy dissipates and people begrudgingly accept the monies that were handed out yesterday to silence us.
I had hoped that a significant portion of the meeting yesterday would be spent organizing this event. Unless the proposed rally next Wednesday is a well-organized and intelligent response to these cuts, I agree that it will not serve our purpose. Is the Alliance going to take the lead in organizing the event next Wednesday?
Arts Slogans
ART $mART
Don`t Gamble with my heART
Observations following the meeting on September 2, 2009
In my opinion, the Alliance must develop at plan; both a short-term and a long-term plan to deal with the various ministries who connect with art and culture. I thought the meeting today, although it showed that hundreds of people were ready together on a moments notice, was weak and unfulfilling. I don't think that the Alliance was prepared for it. And for that, I'm quite disappointed. For Amir to stand up at that meeting and say "what does a lobbyist do, anyway?" says it all. That's what The Alliance is, a lobbyist. You lobby government for artists; you tell politicians about us, what we do; our needs, our desires and the financial conditions under which we work; you encourage them when they are attempting the wrong tact and you correct them with it's clear that they are moving in the right direction. You are prepared for what's to come (which didn't seem apparent at all today) and with us, you plan direction for the future. You are our face to government. Through you, they understand us. That's what a lobbyist does for their client. Put their client at the top of the politicians world. Get things done for their client.
I'm sorry to say that The Alliance has not been a worthy leader during this campaign. Culture critic Spencer Herbert has been telling anybody who would listen about the draconian cuts coming to the Arts and Culture sector and no body believed him - or at least it seems so from the pathetic response of the Alliance with the phrase "we've only had three days to organize this", repeated numerous times today. We've known these cuts were coming for months. Sure, the cuts have been worse than imagined and what did the Alliance have ready for us? Nothing. Not a plan, not a position, not a slogan even - except near the end when one frustrated attendee asked what we were leaving with - and the innocuous phrase "Culture Matters" come out of the ether for us to use in our fight with the BC Liberals. Pathetic.
No, the Alliance was caught flat-footed on this one; ill-prepared and without ideas for their membership. Frankly, that's the worst part. When you have the creative sector angry about their cuts, your job is to come up with options that are going to harness that anger and turn it into creative power that will beat these bean-counters at their own shell game. Was there even a direction to the discussion? Not really, it wandered from person to person hoping against hope that someone would articulate SOMETHING that would encourage us, something that would lift the pall of a meeting with no clarity, direction or, most of all, bereft of IDEAS for what the strategy would be. It was heartbreaking.
Some suggestions were good. Like the one from Katrina Dunn who relayed a story of how France brought it's angry, dispossessed cultural sector into a elegant fighting force by publishing a 'brand' that represented and encapsulated their cause. That "Brand" appeared in every concert venue, art gallery, outdoor concert, and gathering where artists were present - and soon EVERYBODY - lay people and artists alike - knew what this symbol meant and when you see it, you understand that your brother and sister in the arts were fighting mad and they wanted their funding reinstated. It was a great success and the government re-thought it's plan for cuts to the cultural sector.
Our friend from Quebec stated the famous example of funding in Quebec. It's high and it's consistant. They KNOW that supporting the arts means supporting their language in a sea of English. Lay people and arts professionals alike - they understand that it's a common cause benefiting everyone.
The $1.38 argument is the best one we've got so far and it's very simple because it's easy to explain. $1 of government investment in the arts brings back $1.38 in taxes! And that's just taxes. It doesn't include other economic spin-offs that the arts generate. A 38% return on any investment is better than most people are getting these days, so the numbers tell a better story than someone's tale of why the arts are important to the quality of life. To convert people who offer right-wing, anti-culture views and who write letters to the editor telling artists to get "real jobs", give them the simple equation $1=$1.38. It will stop them in their tracks. It's the sweetest equation since E=Mc2 and it's way easier to understand.
I"m sorry to be hard on the Alliance because I think you are all fine and hard-working people. Please understand my critique is about the way you do business and represent us and our cause. It's not personal. But you were unprepared for a cause that was forecast over a year ago; you were unprepared for a meeting with angry artists on how to organize a response to a serious cut to our sector and you had NO IDEAS about how to move forward in a time of great uncertainty. And I must say, that we, the artists, weren't well prepared either. The collective sigh of relief at the beginning was simply hearing emotional release of a bunch of people grateful they have a season this year. But when we all left, was there a rallying cry of pumped people ready to do battle with the BC Liberals. No, because there was no plan. Just a bland slogan of "culture matters" and maybe a gathering at Robson Square next Wedesday that the Alliance wants us to have colourful costumes, songs, props etc. But what are the artists going to do, to say, to act, to sing? Are they going to interrupt traffic? Are they going to look like a high-school happening? What is an Art-in in the 21st century? It needs content that is substantial, otherwise it looks like high-school drama club doing an clown workshop. It's so bloody amateur that I'm shocked that it's going forward as is. That is not art; people on the street will think it's ridiculous and TV viewers will concur.
This is the most important cross-roads that the artists of BC have faced in many years. The future is unclear, the money is low and inconsistent, the role of the BC Arts Council has been reduced to a fuzzy-little-money-giver that is without power and, meanwhile, gambling seems to rule the roost. We need to take control of the situation by playing the economic argument. It's the only one that "they" understand. It's sorry, but it's true.
We need strong leadership on this. We need Amir to step up and organize and inspire the troops. If you don't feel you can do it, step down and get someone who will. It's a powerful position for somebody. We have the artists of our province ready to go, ready to do what needs to be done. Do we have the leadership in the Alliance that will harness that energy and help us win this fight? If we don't win, you know, we're toast. And young artists, seeing no future here with no consistent funding - even money tainted by gambling - will leave. And the Olympic legacy will be nothing, because the arts community didn't rise to meet the challenges offered by a government who didn't care if they lived or died.
With best wishes for a better future,
David
Cuts
Thank you for organizing the meeting today. It will be vitally important to connect with other sectors that are also being cut including libraries.
In the 2009 budget, the government announced $38 million in new funding to promote BC abroad for the Olympics. Security alone for the 2010 Olympics is going to cost $900 million.
Government revenues are expected to rise over the next two years. The cuts to the arts are so short-sighted and the impact will be immediate and widespread. It really is an attack on social infrastructure, on civil society and on people who work in the arts.
meeting today
Thanks for organizing the meeting - very good to have so many in the room and actively involved. (I am not a member but will be before the day is through)
Generally, I think we are better of educating and encouraging and audience than stopping traffic. If there was a planned and very comic effect for stopping traffic perhaps it would be OK otherwise I feel that irritating the general population serves to positive purpose.
Will be checking in frequently,
Best,
Ed
Post new comment